What I’m thinking.. war…


As you might guess, I think about war often — the natural result of the fact that I wrote a dissertation about it AND the fact that we, as people, keep waging war.

Recently it’s come to light that the US has been committing acts of cyber-war.  It seems that the actions fall into defensive and offensive actions.  The justification given by the administration is that such attacks can prevent attacks on US networks and impact on-the-ground kinds of wars by attacking networks of all kinds, including telecommunications and electric grids.

The fact of the matter is that we live in a modern world, with modern conveniences we rely on to continue our way of life — and so do others around the world.  Offensive and defensive cyber attacks can prevent threats from becoming real — all without risk to soldiers.

The problem with cyber-war is that it can — has — and probably will — impact non-combatants.  If the power goes out, a population that relies on electricity will find that their life is significantly disrupted.  The inability to use telecommunications disrupts life on a pretty basic level etc.. The implications are clear.  The question is whether those impacts rise to the level of a violation of non-combatant immunity?

Taking cyber-war a step further, what if the impacts of an offensive cyber war crashed a local or national economy?  It’s hard to argue that persons who lose jobs and homes as a result aren’t harmed — but, do those harms rise to the level of violations of non-combatant immunity?

The thing about cyber-war is that it seems sexy and no-risk — at least to the individual persons launching the attacks.  They live in comfortable places not impacted by the results of those attacks.  The cyber-war seems clean, but since the goal of any war is to impact persons, the question isn’t whether or not someone is at risk, but simply where will the persons at risk reside?


1 Comment

Filed under Applied Ethics, Ethics, Military Ethics

One response to “What I’m thinking.. war…

  1. JC Davis

    A very interesting conjecture… I opine that the luxury of war between armies is something we no longer have. It used to be that a country’s might was measured in its military and its ability to strategize, execute, wage and win in battle. There were rules. Now, it is simply a matter of inflicting pain and damage until the pressure point is so great that the other “side” capitulates. We no longer care much for what that pressure point may be, and sadly even this concept of “sides” and nation-states and state actors is no longer clear. Organized warfare is devolving.

    More and more, there are no “comfortable places” immune from the effects of warfare – but that doesn’t seem to deter our appetite for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s